Your startup stays haunted by its past
How founders shape culture long before they realise it
I didn’t start out looking for ghosts.
They showed up while I was working with two founders who were, by every standard, exceptional. The kind of leaders people actually wanted to follow. And yet, the culture inside their startup was brutal. People burned out. They lost confidence. Some left questioning their own competence. It wasn’t intentional - these weren’t neglectful or careless founders. But there was something in how the company operated that broke the people who believed in it most.
That paradox haunted me. How could great founders create a culture that hurt their team?!
If you’re a founder, you already know the symptoms:
Your top performer starts making noises about looking elsewhere.
Your shiny new hire - the one with the dream CV and all the right credentials - spectacularly fails within six months.
You keep saying this person has “got it” but can’t define what it is.
Your co-founder won’t look you in the eye anymore.
You already know these aren’t just management headaches. Something more insidious is operating beneath your awareness.
And the cost isn’t just turnover, or missed OKRs. It’s bigger. It’s human wreckage - the kind that doesn’t show up in a board report. Broken partnerships between people who used to trust each other. Careers stalled not by lack of talent, but by environments that make talented people doubt themselves. Founders who burn out because they’re drowning in intensity they can’t make sense of.
Because startups aren’t rational. They’re emotional.
The damage compounds. People leave carrying that confusion with them. Was it me? Was I not good enough? They second guess their instincts, shrink into their next role, and carry the weight of something that made them feel small. And you as founder? You double down. Raise the talent bar. Overcorrect. More convinced than ever that other people are the problem, when the real problem is something you can’t see.
You can feel it. You just can’t point to it.
That’s because the thing shaping your culture isn’t a bad policy or a broken process. It’s you.
Your patterns, your instincts, your unexamined defaults all of which were imprinted onto your company from day one, and continue operating long after you’ve stopped consciously choosing them.
I call these organisational ghosts.
What ghosts actually are
You’ve been told a story about startup culture so many times it probably feels like fact.
Culture is “how we do things around here”. Culture is your values, your rituals, your documented norms. If you just write it down clearly enough, model it consistently enough, uphold it firmly enough, you’ll get the culture you want.
Sure. That’s not wrong. But it’s dangerously incomplete.
Because what I’ve seen across dozens of founder-led startups is that by the time you’re trying to do culture, you’ve already built it. The real culture started the very day you founded your company.
A ghost is what’s left behind when a founding moment outlives its original context. Think about your earliest days. The sharp Slack you sent when customer comms went out before you’d had a chance to review them. The disagreement you had with your co-founder in front of everyone that nobody talked about again, but everyone remembered. The hire you made because your investor said they were great. You shoe-horned them into a team that didn’t need them. It didn’t turn out very well.
These moments didn’t end when they first happened, but became the template. They taught your team how to behave, what to value, what to tolerate, and what might even get them fired - moments that happened long before you wrote a single line about culture down.
Ghosts share three traits:
They outlive the people and conditions that created them
They operate beneath conscious awareness
They shape what feels possible today.1
Being a founder is identity work and ghosts are its byproduct. Your relationship with achievement, with conflict, with control, with vulnerability - this isn’t something you can hide from your team. It becomes the emotional blueprint of your company. Not because you have imposed it deliberately, but because in the compressed, high-stakes conditions of startup life, you are the loudest signal in the room. Your team watches how you react to failure. They notice what makes you light up and what makes you withdraw. They calibrate to you before they’ve read a single page of your employee handbook.
Your identity becomes organisational identity, whether you intended it to or not. I’ve seen this happen in every startup I’ve worked with, without exception.
Have I made organisational ghosts sound inherently bad? That was never my intention - ghosts are magical, too.
The ghost that makes your team relentless? That came from you. From the pace you set, the standard you held, the way you responded to mediocrity. It’s the reason your best people produce work that delights your customers. It’s why your team punches above its weight, why competitors can’t figure out how you move so fast, why the people who thrive with you would never go back to a “normal” company.
But they are also the reason your best people burn out.
The ghost that creates fierce belonging, the feeling new hires describe as “I’ve never worked anywhere like this” - that came from a closeness, an intensity, a shared sense of mission you built in the early days. It’s the thing that makes people run through walls for you. It’s also the reason some people can’t leave even when they should. Or how some exits feel like breakups, with regret and grief on both sides. You likely remember these people, even years down the line.
Every ghost is a double edged sword.
Not always at different times, for different people. Often for the same person, in the same week, feeling both the pride of intensely good work and the weight of delivering it.
This is why startups stay haunted by their past and why traditional culture work misses this entirely. Because every person that joins your company is inheriting its ghosts.
Thanks for reading Organisational Ghosts. Subscribe for free to receive new posts.
Three ghosts to get acquainted with
I grappled with these ideas for years before I had the language for them. The same paradox kept showing up across every founding team I worked with - brilliant founders, complicated cultures. A gap between intention and impact that nobody could articulate.
So I spent a year studying it. I interviewed founders, early employees, and newer hires across three startups, mapping the invisible dynamics beneath their stated cultures. The work drew on decades of existing organisational research2, except none of that research looked at startups where these forces are most concentrated and most volatile.
What I found confirmed what I’d sensed: the gap between what founders intend and what teams experience isn’t poor management. It’s the ghost layer. The inherited emotional logic that runs underneath everything.
Dozens of ghosts surfaced in the research. Here are three that might help you recognise your own.
i) What you model
One founder I know had just closed an oversubscribed funding round. The process had taken longer than expected, but she’d done it - in a tough market, with exceptional investors. By any objective measure, it was a win.
Except, when I asked her to reflect on her performance over those six months, she said: “I feel like I did a bad job.”
Her team had learned to measure themselves by exactly the same standard.
“People work harder here than they ever worked at McKinsey,” one team member told me. “100% isn’t enough. It’s only the extra 10%, the extra 20% that gets noted and celebrated. Extraordinary effort is the norm.”
Another said: “We don’t stop to celebrate the wins. We’re already onto the next milestone.”
Her relationship with achievement - the self-criticism, the quick pivot to what’s still missing - had become the team’s own relationship with achievement. She never told them to think that way. She modelled it.
ii) What you value
I worked with a founder who was one of the smartest people I’ve ever met. The kind of smart that thinks in systems, sees around corners, builds compelling visions from nothing. Bold. Contrarian. Sharp in a way that made you want to keep up.
If you could match that sharpness - think on your feet, spar intellectually, challenge ideas in real time - you belonged. If you couldn’t, it was hard to find your footing.
At another company I studied, the founder had the same quality. Deeply curious, first principles thinker, constantly learning. That intellectual intensity wasn’t just his working style. It was identity level. And he’d built a company that reflected it - full of genuinely brilliant people, where even the humour was a performance of cleverness. Being funny meant being smart. Wit was currency.
One team member told me: “Everyone here is so smart. But I don’t always feel that smart. I just know that’s what’s expected.”
For some people, this was energising. The intellectual rigour pushed them to be sharper than they’d ever been. For others, it was exclusionary and meant they struggled to speak up in meetings.
iii) What you protect
One founder told me about driving to work every morning. As he crossed a bridge, he’d mask himself.
On weekends, he was at raves and clubs, deep into electronic music. But his corporate job required a different version of him. So he’d make the switch. Put on the mask. Become who he thought he needed to be.
He didn’t realise it at the time, but the split was causing panic attacks.
Years later, when he started his own company, the bridge stayed with him. He built a place where people could be authentic. No masks. No performance. Radical autonomy. No hierarchy, no asking permission.
For some people, this was liberation. They thrived with the freedom to work however they wanted, be who they were, make decisions without checking every move.
For others, it created its own kind of pressure. The autonomy felt disorienting. One team member described it as “a bit of a head fuck” - not because it was bad, but because it was so unfamiliar. Some people craved more structure, clearer authority, someone to tell them what to do.
Across all three ghosts
None of these ghosts started out as “good” or “bad.” They were survival instincts. You needed to prove your company deserved to exist. Your standards, your intensity, your need for doing things your way were what got you through those early days. They worked, so they stuck.
The patterns embed. They become the filter for who gets hired, who “fits” and who makes it past six months. It wasn’t intentionally designed. “Culture fit” in most startups is really ghost compatibility. Can they match our pace? Do they think the way we think? Do they just love ambiguity? If yes, they can belong. If not, they won’t succeed here.
But ghosts don’t land the same way for everyone.
One person feels the pride of incredible work and the weight of its standards in the same week. Another has stopped speaking up because the cost of being wrong feels too high. Some experience belonging so deep their work has become their identity; others can’t figure out how to belong at all, observing the inner circle and feeling like they’ll never earn their place in it.
It shifts over time too - someone who thrived at eight people might be struggling by the time you’re thirty. How someone experiences your ghosts depends on who they are, how close they are to the founding circle, and how deeply they’ve internalised the scripts your startup runs on.
Founders feel it too. “When I say something,” one told me, “people put too much weight on it. I’m trying to make fewer decisions, not more. But there’s always a founder halo around me.”You built a company that reflects who you are. And then, as it grows, you realise the instincts that built it are the ones you now have to manage most carefully.
Your ghosts are yours alone
Your ghosts won’t look like this. They can’t. That’s the point.
Ghosts are imprints, unique to the founder, the founding conditions, and the specific emotional history of your company. Nobody else has your combination of instincts, experiences, and unresolved patterns. Nobody else reacts the way you do under pressure, values exactly what you value, protects the things you protect.
Maybe you model resilience, not relentless achievement. Maybe you value creativity over intelligence, or structure over freedom. Maybe your ghost is rooted in something you’re still working through - a need for control, a fear of being ordinary, a determination to never replicate the dysfunction you survived on your way here.
Your identity doesn’t just inform your company. It is your company’s operating system. What you care about and what drives you becomes the standard your team calibrates to every single day. Because that’s how humans work. We learn by watching what gets rewarded, what gets punished, and what gets ignored. And in a startup, you are the primary signal for all three.
Now imagine the fun when you have a co-founder carrying their own imprints. Two sets of ghosts, one company…and you wonder why it’s so complicated.
When those ghosts go unnamed, the human wreckage builds.
It’s employee number three, the one who built half of what you have, who you had to let go because the company outgrew their skillset. That exit cut you both deeply.
It’s the co-founder relationship that weakens through the accumulation of small misalignments. Things that never got named. By the time it surfaces, it feels personal. It isn’t. It’s the ghost of decisions you made under pressure that still defines how you relate to each other.
Maybe it’s the operating rhythm everyone knows is unsustainable but nobody questions. It was forged when there were four of you and everything was on fire. Back then it was survival. Now it’s a team of thirty running at the same redline, and the people burning out fastest are the ones you need the most.
And it’s you. The founder who built something remarkable. Who people followed because they believed in what you were building. Who feels every departure as a personal criticism. Who keeps raising the bar - not because the team isn’t good enough, but because your own relationship with achievement won’t let you stop.
These aren’t culture problems you can solve with better values or another offsite. The ghost layer sits underneath all that - beneath your processes, your frameworks, your engagement surveys. Conventional people work focuses on the visible layer, the stuff you can document and measure. But ghosts operate in the emotional bedrock of your company. If you think your startup isn’t emotional, you’re fooling yourself.
The longer ghosts go unnamed, the more of this wreckage you create. Not just in turnover, although that is real. It’s also in the relationships you’ve made, and likely lost, along the way. And it’s in something deeper - startups are intense, volatile, identity-forming environments. The way people come to see themselves inside your company endures long after they’ve left. That’s true for your team. It’s true for you. And it’s a bigger responsibility than most founders realise.
This is why so many culture problems in startups feel personal when they’re not. The tension with your co-founder starts to feel like a character flaw (yours or theirs). When a new hire fails, you judge your own ability to hire. When your team keeps clashing, you assume someone’s the problem.
But ghosts explain the friction. They show you that conflict isn’t just between people - it’s between people and patterns.
Every founder I’ve worked with describes the same arc:
The founding era - when it was speed, unity, intimacy. And a shit ton of fun (in hindsight)
The messy middle - ghosts colliding with new people who bring different expectations, forcing founders to make sharp choices about what to double down on
The other side - a new acceptance that there are now “people who get it” and “people who never will.” They’re not less capable. They’re just being measured against an old rulebook that can’t exist in the same way anymore.
Ghosts explain why early-stage culture feels magical, why the next stage feels chaotic, and why the later stage feels bittersweet. You’re not a bad founder because your culture has sharp edges, contradictions, or confusion. That is culture. Great founders create complicated cultures.
What changes when you see your ghosts
Let me bring you back to the magic of ghosts. I’ve spent a lot of this piece in the wreckage, and that’s far from the whole story.
The ghost that creates ambition in your team - the one that drives pace, quality, ownership - didn’t come from nowhere. It came from you. The ghost that pulls sharp thinkers into the room? That’s your curiosity and depth coming to life through other people. The ghost that protects freedom, or authenticity, or resilience? That’s something you learned to value the hard way, now shaping a space you’re proud of.
Seeing your ghosts doesn’t diminish what’s good. It explains it. You can actually name why your company works.
And that changes how you view the hard parts, too.
The hire who ‘doesn’t get it’? They’re navigating invisible rules nobody told them about. The structure you keep redesigning is rubbing up against something that was set years ago. And the person you think lacks commitment is miscalibrated, not disengaged.
Once you can see the pattern, you stop misdiagnosing. You stop being surprised when the culture tilts towards what it’s always optimised for. You start hiring for the real pattern, not the aspirational one. You can onboard people into the actual inheritance, not a sanitised version.
You can’t erase your ghosts. But you can hold onto the ones that make you powerful, and soften the ones that make things unnecessarily hard.
We shouldn’t be trying to fix culture. We should be trying to understand it.
I’ve helped founders stop apologising for their ambition and build around it deliberately, rather than swinging between intensity and guilt.
I’ve built systems that have finally stuck - they weren’t “better” than what had been tried before, but they were designed for the founder instead of imported from someone else’s playbook.
I’ve sat with co-founders whose relationship dynamics were taking over every waking moment, spilling over into life outside of work. We named what was actually happening underneath, and it became less personal almost immediately.
If this is resonating, sit with these questions:
What moments in our company’s history carry more emotional weight than we admit?
What stories get repeated on our team - and what do they signal?
Who gets socially rewarded in our team, and what for?
Do we have rituals, artefacts, or symbols that have endured, and what work are they actually doing?
What part of my identity do people calibrate to - even when I don’t mean for them to?
Where do people hesitate or second guess because they’re trying to “read the room” (or read me)?
What contradiction exists in our culture that we pretend isn’t there?
So yes - startups stay haunted by their past. But what a powerful lens this gives us.
If this landed
If you recognised your ghosts somewhere in this piece - a pattern you’ve felt but couldn’t name, or the weight of something you couldn’t quite articulate - you’re not alone in it. Every founder I work with carries these imprints. The brilliant ones, the contrarian ones, the ones who have built incredible companies.
Your startup has ghosts. And they’re not something to be afraid of. Ghosts are the reason startups feel so magical. The intensity, the challenge, the irrational conviction that this matters - it’s what makes people do the best work of their lives and why they remember your company long after they’ve left. The wreckage and the magic come from the same place.
If my work has resonated, I’d love to swap ghost stories.
